after having posted that bourgeoisie blogese (true,this link only enforces Kesavan's second-hand comment),i came across the TOI piece which forced me to give a second thought.i have stated in my post that it is a commonplace to harangue ABP at Presi but it seemed(at least,for a while,yes)that i too was waylaid by that Presi ethos:was i wrong in suspecting Telegraph of McCarthy-ism?was it just another interpretation that could always be rightly different from HT?and by the way why should HT be laying the standards?moreover,how could i single out just a newspiece to make such an allegation?
whatever,i still cannot deny that i have totally purged myself of the Presi ethos:that gut feeling for something devilish in ABP propaganda still doesn't go though i have been able to become a little critical about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment