Sunday, September 20, 2009
Quality of life and development
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Friday, August 7, 2009
This is the way to write a lead!
Now that the flood is gone
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Friday, July 3, 2009
Gays of the country unite!
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Who dares wins

First, we let deprivation kill them; then when they understood what was really happening and tried to snatch away what was their moral- and, to mention in passing, constitutional- right to choose a decent life, we let the state kill them.
Winning at games
We are witnessing weird games being played in Lalgarh. The state, propped up by a silent 'us', with its frustrated and raging forces is engaged in a combat game against the Maoists, anti-bourgeoisie radicals who are standing up with all their might for the indigenous tribals. These people remain peripheral to our imagination even after six decades of 'free democracy'. Now that these rebels have goaded the beast within the state into action, it is only a matter of 'who dares, wins'- as we know what has happened to innumerable social movements that dared to challenge the very logic of democracy in this country.
Basic premiss of the state
We have reacted to the news of the clashes in Lalgarh in the media with a general acceptance of their 'genuine grievances' but rejection of their violent means. But do we really care? Or, could we have cared had it not been for this 'violence'? We have always remained cold to ideas that call for an upheaval and instead settle down for tokens of 'change'. When some men and women on the 'lunatic fringe' try to bring the much-needed revolutionary changes, we prefer being silent and accepting the statist doctrine of right and wrong. And what is that doctrine based upon? Might is right.
Will the dharma yuddha pay off?
And will this dharma yuddha by the Maoists make the original inhabitants of this land a better lot? I don't have an answer to that but I fear that their grievances will become a collateral damage of the on-going repression of their movement. As has been the case before.
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Chaddi pehen ke phool khila hai (Green shoots in undies?)

For people of my age, the pink chaddi campaign seemed no less than a revolution. Girls coming out to hit back at the cultural vigilantes in the most profane of ways. It was, it seemed, a new beginning for this country's youth- even though few among them seem to support it, coming up with such a novel and ingenious method up of protests. Until I read Githa Hariharan's article in the morning today, this was how I felt about this sacrilegous campaign. But it seems women in this country have always been far ahead of their menfolk insofaras modernity is concerned. Women learnt pulling down chaddis (read the article) to protest against reactionary culturalists long back. In India, revolutions have always been flowering in chaddis!
The Great Leap Backward

Could he or couldn't he? The Telegraph tells us that people in the Left Front are busy with historical what-if analyses. I was too small to know this Great Helmsman's name, forget his politics, when I was in Calcutta. And by the time I was old enough to understand and be interested in these things I left for Pilani. And for the next six years knew nothing about the developments in the political landscape of Bengal. When I came back in 2006 to study at Presidency, I did hear my friends in SFI talking about him with great respect and admiration that Mamata could never have pulled off a moral victory, of sorts in Singur had he been alive. That he was also responsible for the rot that Bengal is today was news to me.
And India is an amazing country: where else do you think Amartya Sen's advice in policy affairs would be rejected so casually, even if he hadn't won a Nobel then? Today he gives lectures in seminars organised by the very same state government.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Scientific Communism

Sunday, May 3, 2009
Why are things the way they are?

Hanna Schmitz prefers being read to a sentence for imprisonment for life than letting people discover that she can't read. Its strange how sometimes some of our emotions overpower us in bizarre ways-should I call it irrational, but what would a 'rational person' mean then: homo economicus? Her feeling of shame is so strong that she can accept being branded a Nazi, but not uneducated.
I remember reading Kafka's Trial which portrays a man who thinks that he has done no wrong but still on being charged is filled with guilt and tries everything that can be done to clear himself of the allegations that have been wrongly made about him, only to die without ever knowing what it was that he was charged of and by whom. Though, this angle was opened to me only when I was reading Basu's Prelude to Political Economy. Another similarity is the way Hanna conflates legality and morality that Michael's professor discusses in one of the seminars at the law school. Hanna doesn't understand how she could have done anything wrong when all she had done was stick to the law of the land; Josef K gets so worked up on being charged and his righteous indignation at being alleged of something that smears his otherwise record of obedience only reminds us how people in their lives confuse 'legal' with 'moral', and its not just because "before the law sits a gatekeeper": the individual has an inner feeling of guilt , too, that makes it even easier for the law to overpower her sense of rebellion and revolt.
Friday, May 1, 2009
Flagged

Early morning on a holiday at 09:50 I come to Cyber Cup hoping its open, and yes, it is. But before I enter Patuatola lane, where this cafe is located, I cannot stop myself from calling them names (of course, its all to myself; I don't shout: ARE YOU CRAZY?) who had hoisted all those red, etc flags over shops, people's homes, on the electric poles and anywhere they felt like. There's a CPM party office at the mouth of this lane but the flags are of all hues: and some say there's no democracy in Bengal,huh! All parties are free here to use my home, your home, my shop, your shop, my walls, your walls as their own for they are the People's representatives, real representatives.
I enter the cafe. Babai Da has just taken bath and is opening the attendance register for today's entries. I ask him, "Jhanda gulo nije lagiyecho na keo lagiye chole galo?". He doesn't understand what I'm talking about. I tell him to go out and look at the flags he apparently seems to endorse; he sees a TMC and a Congress flag on his gate and shop-window. He doesn't know who did this or when. There's a large CPM drape hanging at the other mouth of this lane. And all buildings in this lane can proudly claim to have at least one flag.
What is it with me early in the morning? As if I don't know this or they don't know this that I'm writing about. These are quotidian matters. Will I stop killing time like this on my blog?
Thursday, April 30, 2009
A switch is a switch is a twitch
These chai ki dukans are a part and parcel of Indian life and ethos. And more than that this is a rozi-roti for many. When the opposition in Bengal raised doubts about the claim government and sections in media were making about the number of jobs Tatas would be able to create, it was these kind of jobs in the informal sector- "indirect jobs"- that they said would supplement the few jobs created by the car factory directly. And this argument was bought by the classes without any second thoughts.
I know I'm sounding moralish but doesn't it cause a pang in somewhere to see that this is what some people are being offered as subsistence for their lives and then those who sold these ideas to them slighting them?
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Frontal moralism/Dorsal doublespeak
Buddha calls Maoists cowards in his campaigns; CPM is fighting the coming elections as a United(!) bloc with them in Bihar. Congress' politics is all about wheel and deal; Bardhan thinks Mayawati is being tainted by the elitists. BJP is out to divide the country once again in the name of religion; Vijayan can't see Madani isn't even acceptable to the Indian Union Muslim League, a party based on religion.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Never mind
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
this, when indians are dying for entertainment!
"dispatches took root on an olive farm in Provence, flourished on a Kashmiri houseboat, and was toasted into reality with champagne at the East Gate of Angkor Wat. Its founders are a photographer who believes his lens should not filter out humanity, a reporter who feels real news can only be seen from up close in its historical perspective, and a pharmaceutical executive who thinks entrepreneurs should do more than make money."
the Indian masses are only learning to handle a life that begins and ends with sound bites and breaking news pieces. And there's no doubt that they're game for more. this adrenaline-rush model where news items come into the public consciousness and go out of it only to be replaced with more news at the speed of sound, if not light is nothing new: its new only for us.
Anyway, what I’m talking about here is this new venture,or adventure rather since the American Journal Review characterises it as bucking the trend (. At a time when attention spans are falling from mins to secs to nanos to..., this group of gamblers brings out a piece of journalism that would seem counter intuitive to the dominant logic of market.
Even though papers, in the West, are becoming redundant, TVs endangered and Web seems to be calling the shots, or would be doing so, they really believe that they'll be able to pull off without the virtual resources. I won't say anymore, read it for yourself:
Monday, March 2, 2009
Rejected!
-GBS, Preface to Plays Pleasant
Unfortunately, India as a nation-state has shown little enthusiasm for an artist's vision of the times to come. Instead, we have been much eager to dissociate ourselves, and even try and do away with our artists. To what extent India as peoples have been successful in tolerating them might be debatable, but is still, I think, full of hope. For attempts to garrote the creative voices, even though successful to some extent, have deeply divided our society-and its not just the intelligentsia that has taken up the cudgels.The common man was never ready to acquiesce to their leaders in such matters, otherwise the most popular leader of this country, Gandhi could have easily ensured that all 'obscene' sculptures around the country à la Khajuraho were removed from the imagination of this country, and the world, once and for all in the Bamiyanesque fashion. Husain might not be able to live in this country, but certainly he lives in the hearts of the artists of the nation, as well as in those who understand that life may not be for art but indeed, life couldn't be without art, too. Besides, even after what Husain suffered, if Baroda could happen then we needn't fret and whine. I have heard people talking derisively about Nasrin's literary standards in college, but even if someone thinks Penthouse a better read, I'd prefer Nirbachito Column under my pillow. And before anyone thinks my attitude as puerile, let me make myself clear that I don't dream of a day with unbridled freedom of speech where no one even cares what another says, forget offence. For such a heaven would be boring. As for offence, Ashish Nandy put it pithily when he remarked about Arundhati Roy-"It is the right of every independent thinker to think irresponsibly and hurt the sentiments of the majority on any issue."
Saturday, February 14, 2009

Tharoor,Tharoor,par kya yeh theek hai?
